When economists want to analyse how the wealth and living standards of people within a country are progressing, most of the time they look at GDP per-capita. The use of this statistic has a couple of key advantages:
- It is (relatively) straightforward to measure.
- It is positively correlated with many other standard-of-life indicators (e.g. life expectancy, education, life satisfaction).
And so on my analysis. I have used inflation adjusted New Zealand income data from the IRD. As with my Gini coefficient study, I only wanted to consider full-time workers, so I removed anyone who earns less than the full-time wage for each year. I thought that this would reduce the bias in my investigation, and besides, I am more interested in the changes in median income and not the actual value.
Year | Median income (nominal values) | Median income (2010 prices) |
2001 | $28,500 | $35,800 |
2002 | $29,500 | $36,000 |
2003 | $30,500 | $36,700 |
2004 | $32,500 | $38,200 |
2005 | $35,500 | $40,600 |
2006 | $37,600 | $41,300 |
2007 | $40,500 | $43,600 |
2008 | $42,500 | $44,000 |
2009 | $43,500 | $44,200 |
2010 | $43,500 | $43,500 |
As you can see from the table and chart, the first ten years of 2010 have been a decade of two halves. From 2002 to 2007 median yearly income jumped from $30 000 to $40 000, an increase of around 4% per-year in real terms. After 2007, growth in median income vanished, probably as a result of the Global Financial Crisis and subsequent recession. It would be very interesting to see how median income will change in the coming years.
No comments:
Post a Comment